Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that only 17–37% of the approximately 77 million people who need a wheelchair have access to one. Many organizations are trying to address this need through varying service delivery approaches. For instance, some adhere to WHO’s recommended 8-steps service approach while others provide wheelchairs with little to no service. There is limited and sometimes conflicting evidence of the impact of the WHO’s recommendations on the outcomes of wheelchair provision. To help build this evidence, we \\explored outcomes of two groups of users who received their wheelchairs through two service models over time. The 8-Steps group (n = 118) received a wheelchair selected from a range of models from service providers trained using the WHO process, and the standard of care (SOC) group (n = 24) received hospital-style wheelchairs and without clinical service. Interviews were conducted at baseline and at follow-up 3 to 6 months after provision, to collect data about wheelchair usage, satisfaction, skills, maintenance and repairs, and life satisfaction. Across-group statistical comparisons were not appropriate due to significant differences between groups. In general, participants used their wheelchairs every day but reported very low mobility levels (<500 meters for the 8-steps group, and <100 meters for the SOC group.) The 8-steps group used their wheelchair for either between 1–3 hours per day, or more than 8 hours per day. The SOC used it between 1 and 3 hours per day. Overall, wheelchair usage and wheelchair skills decreased over the 3- to 6-month data collection timeline. Wheelchair breakdowns were common in both groups emphasizing the need for maintenance, occurring more frequently in the 8-Steps (28.8%) compared to the SOC group (8%), and emphasizing the need for maintenance services. No significant differences were found when comparing device satisfaction across wheelchairs types. Our results emphasize the need for routine maintenance to address frequent wheelchair breakdowns. Our results also demonstrate a large disparity in several outcome variables across groups which motivates future studies where across-group comparisons are possible.

Highlights

  • There is a significant unmet need for appropriate wheelchairs around the world

  • Efforts to disseminate these tools are substantial—they are widely promoted by different organizations (e.g. WFOT, WCPT, ISWP, ISPO), they are translated into several languages, and they are being adopted as the basis for global training [11, 12], and competency evaluations [13]

  • Puspadi is staffed by service providers who were all trained to provide services using the 8-Steps service provision model described in the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines [7], whereas Bunga Bali Foundation (BBF) and the Social Department use the standard of care (SOC) to distribute hospital-style wheelchairs to those who requested them without any clinical services

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There is a significant unmet need for appropriate wheelchairs around the world. Using population-based estimates published by WHO, approximately 77 million people worldwide currently require the use of a wheelchair for mobility [1]. Data collected in several less-resourced settings (LRS) on access to assistive technologies suggests that only between 17% and 37% have access to appropriate assistive technologies, such as wheelchairs Based on these data, an estimated 33–65 million people who need wheelchairs do not have access to them. A consensus conference held in 2006 led by the WHO [6] resulted in the development and publication of consensus guidelines [7] on manual wheelchair provision, and a set of consensus-based training packages to educate wheelchair service providers [8,9,10] Efforts to disseminate these tools are substantial—they are widely promoted by different organizations (e.g. WFOT, WCPT, ISWP, ISPO), they are translated into several languages, and they are being adopted as the basis for global training [11, 12], and competency evaluations [13]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call