Abstract

BackgroundIn responding to Covid-19, governments have tried to balance protecting health while minimizing gross domestic product (GDP) losses. We compare health-related net benefit (HRNB) and GDP losses associated with government responses of the UK, Ireland, Germany, Spain and Sweden from UK healthcare payer perspective.MethodsWe compared observed cases, hospitalizations and deaths under ‘mitigation’ to modelled events under ‘no mitigation’ to 20 July 2020. We thus calculated healthcare costs, quality adjusted life years (QALYs), and HRNB at £20,000/QALY saved by each country. On per population (i.e. per capita) basis, we compared HRNB with forecast reductions in 2020 GDP growth (overall or compared with Sweden as minimal mitigation country) and qualitatively and quantitatively described government responses.ResultsThe UK saved 3.17 (0.32–3.65) million QALYs, £33 (8–38) billion healthcare costs and £1416 (220–1637) HRNB per capita at £20,000/QALY. Per capita, this is comparable to £1455 GDP loss using Sweden as comparator and offsets 46.1 (7.1–53.2)% of total £3075 GDP loss. Germany, Spain, and Sweden had greater HRNB per capita. These also offset a greater percentage of total GDP losses per capita. Ireland fared worst on both measures. Countries with more mask wearing, testing, and population susceptibility had better outcomes. Highest stringency responses did not appear to have best outcomes.ConclusionsOur exploratory analysis indicates the benefit of government Covid-19 responses may outweigh their economic costs. The extent that HRNB offset economic losses appears to relate to population characteristics, testing levels, and mask wearing, rather than response stringency.

Highlights

  • Covid-19 has caused severe health and economic damage since its emergence in Wuhan, China at the end of 2019

  • Spain, and Sweden had greater health-related net benefit (HRNB) per capita. These offset a greater percentage of total Gross Domestic Product (GDP) losses per capita

  • The economic damage has been dramatic with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) reducing its forecast Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth for 2020 in the UK from 1.4% in January to -9.8% in October.[2,3]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Covid-19 has caused severe health and economic damage since its emergence in Wuhan, China at the end of 2019. As of 13th November 2020, the World Health Organisation (WHO) has reported over 50 million confirmed cases and 1.29 million deaths globally.[1] In the UK there have been over a million cases and over 60,000 deaths. The economic damage has been dramatic with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) reducing its forecast Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth for 2020 in the UK from 1.4% in January to -9.8% in October.[2,3] Similar reductions have been observed across Europe and the world. In responding to covid-19, governments have tried to balance protecting health while minimising Gross Domestic Product (GDP) losses. We compare health-related net benefit (HRNB) and GDP losses associated with government responses of the UK, Ireland, Germany, Spain, and Sweden from UK healthcare payer perspective

Objectives
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.