Exploratory analysis of the accuracy of echocardiographic parameters for the assessment of right ventricular function and right ventricular–pulmonary artery coupling

Abstract

AbstractEchocardiography is a widely used modality for the assessment of right ventricular (RV) function; however, few studies have comprehensively compared the accuracy of echocardiographic parameters using invasively obtained reference values. Therefore, this exploratory study aimed to compare the accuracy of echocardiographic parameters of RV function and RV–pulmonary artery (PA) coupling. We calculated four indices of RV function (end‐systolic elastance [Ees] for systolic function [contractility], τ for relaxation, and β and end‐diastolic elastance [Eed] for stiffness), and an index of RV–PA coupling (Ees/arterial elastance [Ea]), using pressure catheterization, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and a single‐beat method. We then compared the correlations of RV indices with echocardiographic parameters. In 63 participants (54 with pulmonary hypertension (PH) and nine without PH), Ees and τ correlated with several echocardiographic parameters, such as RV diameter and area, but the correlations were moderate (|correlation coefficients (ρ)| < 0.5 for all parameters). The correlations of β and Eed with echocardiographic parameters were weak, with |ρ| < 0.4. In contrast, Ees/Ea closely correlated with RV free wall longitudinal strain (RVFW‐LS)/estimated systolic PA pressure (eSPAP) (ρ = −0.72). Ees/Ea also correlated with tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion/eSPAP, RV diameter, and RV end‐systolic area, with |ρ | >0.65. In addition, RVFW‐LS/eSPAP yielded high sensitivity (0.84) and specificity (0.75) for detecting reduced Ees/Ea. The present study indicated a limited accuracy of echocardiographic parameters in assessing RV systolic and diastolic function. In contrast to RV function, they showed high accuracy for assessing RV–PA coupling, with RVFW‐LS/eSPAP exhibiting the highest accuracy.