Abstract

ObjectiveUp to 60% of patients with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with 177Lu prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligand therapy (RLT) achieves a partial biochemical response with a decrease of > 50% in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. The remaining fractions, however, do not respond to RLT. The aim of this explorative analysis was to identify pre-therapeutic factors for the prediction of response.Methods46 patients [age = 68 years (50–87)] with mCRPC who consecutively underwent RLT with 177Lu PSMA [median applied activity = 6 GBq (2.9–6.2)] were included and analysed retrospectively. The association of different clinical and laboratory factors and parameters from pre-therapeutic 68Ga PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) with the outcome of RLT was tested (Fisher’s test). Outcome was defined as PSA changes 8 weeks after second RLT [partial response (PR), PSA decrease > 50%; progressive disease (PD), PSA increase ≥ 25%; stable disease (SD), others]. Significant predictive factors were combined in a predictive score.Results30% showed a post-treatment PR (median 73% PSA decrease), 35% SD (median 17% PSA decrease) and 35% PD (median 42% PSA increase). Significant predictors for PD were alkaline phosphatase (ALP) > 135 U/l (p = 0.002), PSA > 200 ng/ml (p = 0.036), and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the “hottest lesion” in pre-therapeutic PET < 45 (p = 0.005). The predictive score including PSA, ALP and SUVmax could separate 2 distinct groups of patients: ≤ 2 predictive factors (19% PD) and 3 predictive factors (90% PD).ConclusionThe presented predictive score allowed a pre-therapeutic estimate of the expected response to 2 cycles of RLT. As our study was retrospective, prospective trials are needed for validation.

Highlights

  • Prostate cancer has the highest incidence and the third highest cancer related mortality for men in Europe [1]

  • The presence of visceral metastases, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≥ 220 U/L [5], high platelet count, a regular need for analgesics [6] or elevated lactate dehydrogenase [7] has been identified as a negative predictor for the outcome, whereas ALP < 220 U/L, a cumulative injected activity ≥ 18.8 GBq [8], albumin ≥ 38.6 g/L, aspartate transaminase (AST) ≤ 24 U/L, haemoglobin ≥ 10.4 g/dL, absence of liver metastases [9], and higher standardized uptake value (SUV) mean or max in positron emission tomography (PET) with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligands have been reported to be associated with favourable outcomes [10]

  • Inclusion criteria were: (1) at least two cycles of radioligand therapy (RLT) with 177Lu PSMA, (2) 68Ga PSMA positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) examination in the same department ≤ 8 weeks prior to first cycle of RLT and (3) complete patient records including follow-up for at least 2 months after second cycle RLT. patients were excluded for the following reasons: PSMA-PET prior to RLT in other facilities or non-PET imaging with PSMA ligands (n = 43) and absence of follow-up after RLT (n = 2), the final study population included patients

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Prostate cancer has the highest incidence and the third highest cancer related mortality for men in Europe [1]. Several treatment options for patients with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have become established, including abiraterone, enzalutamide, docetaxel and cabazitaxel [2]. The presence of visceral metastases, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≥ 220 U/L [5], high platelet count, a regular need for analgesics [6] or elevated lactate dehydrogenase [7] has been identified as a negative predictor for the outcome, whereas ALP < 220 U/L, a cumulative injected activity ≥ 18.8 GBq [8], albumin ≥ 38.6 g/L, aspartate transaminase (AST) ≤ 24 U/L, haemoglobin ≥ 10.4 g/dL, absence of liver metastases [9], and higher standardized uptake value (SUV) mean or max in positron emission tomography (PET) with PSMA ligands have been reported to be associated with favourable outcomes [10]. The predictive value of these factors varies significantly between studies

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call