Abstract

Orientation: The generational diversity of employees evident in today’s workforce and the important role of reward in meeting a wide variety of needs to attract, motivate and retain employees for the organisation are a key strategic contribution.Research purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore how, whether and to what degree employees from different generational groups differ about preferences on total reward components in the fast-moving consumer goods industry, for purposes of attraction, retention and motivation.Motivation for the study: The rationale for this study was to explore and improve the understanding of reward preferences of different generation groups.Research design and method: The research was a quantitative, empirical and descriptive study of reward preferences in an industry-specific context. A self-administered survey instrument was used and analysed using tests for internal consistency and scale reliability, various measures for factor analysis and a general linear model, involving a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), to test for significant differences between independent and dependent variables.Main findings: Baby Boomers, Xers and Millennials did not differ significantly about preferences regarding financial and non-financial rewards. Millennials do not prefer non-financial rewards to financial rewards. The variance, however, was not large.Practical or managerial implications: The research results provide management with informed knowledge of the types of rewards that can be administered to employees of different generational groups to attract, retain and motivate them.Contribution and value add: The research has added insight into the reward preferences of generational groups and made recommendations for improving reward strategy for the attraction, retention and motivation of employees in the fast-moving consumer goods industry.

Highlights

  • Orientation ‘Everyone is different and everyone brings value to the organisation’ stated Rubin, as cited by Rose (2013, p. 31)

  • A Cronbach’s alpha score of reliability measured 0.894 on the 45 questionnaire items instrument. This is above the acceptable level of 0.70 (Bussin & Van Rooy, 2014; DeVellis, 2016; Pallant, 2013), indicating internal consistency and scale reliability of the Rewards Preference Questionnaire applied in the main survey

  • This study found that H02 was accepted, meaning that Millennials did not prefer non-financial rewards to financial rewards

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Orientation ‘Everyone is different and everyone brings value to the organisation’ stated Rubin, as cited by Rose (2013, p. 31). This quotation succinctly captures the essence of this study, namely the diversity of employees present in today’s workforce and the important role of reward in meeting a wide variety of needs to attract, motivate and retain talent for the organisation and its sustained competitiveness (Brown & Reilly, 2013). This study seeks to understand the reward preferences of diverse generational groups in today’s workforce. Several research objectives were identified for the literature review and empirical study. The literature review aimed at conceptualising different generation cohorts and their reward preferences, as well as describing different components of total reward. The empirical study aimed at establishing how, whether and to what degree employees from different generational groups differ about preferences on total reward components

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call