Abstract
The original intention of accomplice withdrawal is to make up the existing deficiencies in accomplice discontinuance system and solve the problem that doer carries out withdrawal but can not stop accomplished offense and results in criminal liability. However, during the further study of accomplice withdrawal theory, it gradually becomes an independent theory that differs from accomplice discontinuance and fully shows its advantages. However, in our current criminal law, there are still no relevant articles of law about accomplice withdrawal. Thus, in juridical practice, there is no specific legal ground to the punishment of accomplice withdrawal. As a result, accomplice withdrawal theory should be introduced to our criminal law, realizing sinicization.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
