Abstract

Personality is an intriguing phenomenon in populations because it constrains behavioral flexibility. One theory suggests that personality could be generated and maintained if dependent on asset protection. It is predicted that trade-offs with fitness expectations and survival probability encourage consistent behavioral differences among individuals (personality). Although not mutually exclusive, the social niche specialization hypothesis suggests that a group of individuals that repeatedly interact will develop personality to avoid costly social conflict. The point at which behavioral consistency originates in the social niche hypothesis is still unclear, with predictions for development after a change in social status. In the facultative cooperatively breeding Seychelles warbler (Acrocephalus sechellensis), residing on Cousin Island, breeding vacancies are limited and this forces individuals into different social roles. We used this system to test whether reproductive and social state predicted among-individual differences in exploration. We had 2 predictions. First, that an individual's start in life can predict personality, whereby young individuals with a good start to life (associated with early age reproduction and earlier onset survival senescence) are fast explorers, suggesting reproductive state-dependence. Second, that an individual's social status can predict personality, whereby dominant individuals will be fast explorers, suggesting that the behavior is social state-dependent. Neither of the behaviors was associated with social state and social state did not affect behavioral consistency. However, novel object exploration was associated with a proxy of reproductive state. Our results provide further support for state being a mechanism for generating individual differences in behavior.

Highlights

  • The occurrence of consistent differences in behavior among individuals, known as animal personality (Sih et al 2004; Réale et al 2007), is an intriguing phenomenon considering that a flexible behavioral response should enable individuals to adapt to varying environments (Wolf et al 2007; Réale et al 2010)

  • We have shown that social state does not explain behavioral differences in exploration nor affect behavioral consistency

  • Instead we show that a proxy of reproductive state, sex, and age affect individual differences in novel object exploration, and repeat testing affects individual differences in novel environment exploration

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The occurrence of consistent differences in behavior among individuals, known as animal personality (Sih et al 2004; Réale et al 2007), is an intriguing phenomenon considering that a flexible behavioral response should enable individuals to adapt to varying environments (Wolf et al 2007; Réale et al 2010). Personality can be highly heritable (Dochtermann et al 2015) and can affect fitness (Smith and Blumstein 2008), but little is known about how it is maintained at the individual or population level (Bell 2007). To gain further evolutionary understanding as to why personality is generated and maintained, we require longitudinal studies of personality in the wild. This is because captive environments can alter an individual’s behavioral expression and longitudinal studies on free-living organisms in the natural environment are a way to circumvent this (Stamps and Groothuis 2010)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call