Abstract
For a large healthcare system, ignoring costs associated with managing the patient encounter denial process (staffing, contracts, etc.), total denial-related amounts can be more than $1B annually in gross charges. Being able to predict a denial before it occurs has the potential for tremendous savings. Using machine learning to predict denial has the potential to allow denial-preventing interventions. However, challenges of data imbalance make creating a single generalized model difficult. We employ two biased models in a hybrid voting scheme to achieve results that exceed the state-of-the art and allow for incremental predictions as the encounter progresses. The model had the added benefit of monitoring the human-driven denial process that affect the underlying distribution, on which the models’ bias is based.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
