Abstract
Most-favored-nation (MFN) clauses have been used to address a repeat player's time-inconsistency problem in international trade, durable-goods monopoly pricing, franchise contracting, and settlement bargaining. We argue that a nonrepeat player (an early-bargaining plaintiff) can use an MFN to profitably modify the subsequent bargaining game between the defendant and a later-bargaining plaintiff. If an MFN is triggered (which can happen in equilibrium), the early plaintiff receives an additional payment. Less obviously, the early plaintiff's incentives for information revelation are enhanced by this potential payment, so the defendant can resort to trial less frequently. Conditions exist such that an MFN increases total surplus.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
