Abstract

In engineering practice, multiple repair actions are considered carefully by designers, and their success or failure defines further control actions and the evolution of the system state. Such treatment is not fully supported by the current state-of-the-art in dependability analysis. We propose a novel approach for explicit modelling and analysis of repairable systems, and describe an implementation, which builds on HiP-HOPS, a method and tool for model-based synthesis of dependability evaluation models. HiP-HOPS is augmented with Pandora, a temporal logic for the qualitative analysis of Temporal Fault Trees (TFTs), and capabilities for quantitative dependability analysis via Stochastic Activity Networks (SAN). Dependability prediction is achieved via explicit modelling of local failure and repair events in a system model and then by: (i) propagation of local effects through the model and synthesis of repair-aware TFTs for the system, (ii) qualitative analysis of TFTs that respects both failure and repair logic and (iii) quantification of dependability via translation of repair-aware TFTs into SAN. The approach provides insight into the effects of multiple and alternative failure and repair scenarios, and can thus be useful in reconfigurable systems that typically employ software to utilise functional redundancies in a variety of ways.

Highlights

  • S YSTEM dependability includes safety, reliability, availability, maintainability, confidentiality, and integrity attributes [1]

  • The generic functionality of the repairable primary standby (PS) system can be seen as a power supply system which has the primary power supply (A), the secondary power supply (B), the fault detection and reconfiguration component (S) and the input power (I)

  • We presented a novel approach for analysis of dynamic repairable systems

Read more

Summary

Introduction

S YSTEM dependability includes safety, reliability, availability, maintainability, confidentiality, and integrity attributes [1]. In this work we will consider reliability, availability, maintainability and safety. Reliability Block Diagrams (RBD) [2] or Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) [3] have been applied for the dependability analysis of systems. Whilst these methods can be used to assess the effects of combinations of faults, they are not able to capture system dynamics such as event sequences, triggering events or redundancies. Industrial systems typically include repairable components either through self-healing or via external reconfiguration which repairs the failed component by restarting it or switching to an alternative component. The repair strategy determines the system’s reaction to failures through repair events, e.g. when a component fails, the repair strategy determines which component should replace the failed component, and when the failed component is repaired whether it should come into operation or remain in the standby state

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.