Abstract

Abstract Military defections during major anti-authoritarian protests have received significant attention. Yet instances of military disloyalty, commonly termed defections, often actually involve different parts of the military organization. Middle- and high-ranking officers may unite to defect, or they may fragment, with some defecting and others remaining loyal. In this article, I draw on the existing scholarship’s insights to argue that a dictator that uses control of internal security forces marginalizes all officers and increases the likelihood of united defections, whereas a dictator that uses military politicization marginalizes only some officers and increases the likelihood of fragmented defections. I assess and find support for these relationships statistically, using data on types of defections across a large N sample of all major anti-authoritarian protests from 1960 to 2011. I also illustrate the relationships using two brief comparative cases, Chile (1988) and El Salvador (1979).

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.