Abstract

Legal economists have explained the standard of proof in criminal law by exploring the asymmetry between social costs of false negatives (acquitting guilty defendants) and false positives (convicti...

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Similar Papers

Paper Title
Journal
Date
Author
Comment on “Explaining the Standard of Proof in Criminal Law: A New Insight”
Abraham L Wickelgren
Supreme Court Economic Review | VOL. 25
Abraham L WickelgrenAbraham L Wickelgren
01 Jan 2017
Principles of Reversal Burden of Proof in the Perspective of Indonesian Criminal Law and Islamic Law
Gunaldi Ahmad ... Mhd Rasid Ritonga
JURNAL HUKUM ISLAM | VOL. 20
Gunaldi Ahmad, et. al.Gunaldi Ahmad ... Mhd Rasid Ritonga
22 Dec 2022
Prevention of Crime and the Optimal Standard of Proof in Criminal Law
Henrik Lando
Review of Law & Economics | VOL. 5
Henrik LandoHenrik Lando
17 Jan 2009
Prevention of Crime and the Optimal Standard of Proof in Criminal Law
Henrik Lando
SSRN | VOL. 5
Henrik LandoHenrik Lando
19 Nov 2003
View more papers

More From: Supreme Court Economic Review

Paper Title
Journal
Date
Author
Comment on “Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment in Japan: An Analysis Using Nonstationary Time-Series Data”
Bryan C Mccannon
Supreme Court Economic Review | VOL. 28
Bryan C MccannonBryan C Mccannon
01 Oct 2020
Accuracy of Verdicts under Different Jury Sizes and Voting Rules
Alice Guerra ... Francesco Parisi
Supreme Court Economic Review | VOL. 28
Alice Guerra, et. al.Alice Guerra ... Francesco Parisi
01 Oct 2020
Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment in Japan: An Analysis Using Nonstationary Time-Series Data
Daisuke Mori
Supreme Court Economic Review | VOL. 28
Daisuke MoriDaisuke Mori
01 Oct 2020
Comment on “Six Dimensions of Criminal Procedure”
Siona Listokin
Supreme Court Economic Review | VOL. 28
Siona ListokinSiona Listokin
01 Oct 2020
View more papers