Abstract

Annual reports are a central element of international bureaucracies' accountability communication to member states and other stakeholders. Most UN system bureaucracies produce reports of significant length and detail. International agencies use these reports to draw attention to particular challenges or successes. Hitting the right tone with their diverse stakeholders is crucial to maintain continued support. UN agencies do so by employing differentiated sentiment-loaded language alongside factual reporting. We argue that agencies' operational focus, administrative structures and resource mobilization needs have a significant impact on how they use sentiment to communicate with different stakeholder groups. Drawing on a dictionary-based sentiment analysis of three text corpora of annual reports produced by three UN system agencies—UNRWA (reports published from 1951 to 2019), UNHCR (1953–2019) and IOM (2000–2019)—we show a general trend toward increased positive sentiment use across all three agencies, coinciding with a period of stronger donor orientation. At the same time, we find a more volatile and agency-specific use of negative sentiment in response to field-level challenges that are communicated to stakeholders in line with agencies' evolving mandates. Through a text-as-data perspective, this contribution enhances our comparative understanding of the diverse and context-dependent language of international bureaucracies. Points for practitioners Reading UN agency reporting, practitioners need to be aware of the constraints and incentives that international bureaucrats face—notably operational focus, administrative structures and resource needs—that drive tone differences across reports and over time.

Highlights

  • Reporting back to member states and other stakeholders is a standard task of the bureaucracies of international organizations (IOs)

  • We argue that annual reports are an important tool for United Nations (UN) agencies to communicate with key stakeholders, such as member state principals, donors, agency staff and beneficiary populations

  • We demonstrate significant and meaningful variation in the way that the three agencies—UNRWA, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and International Organization for Migration (IOM)—interact with their environments and employ sentiment to engage with their stakeholders

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Reporting back to member states and other stakeholders is a standard task of the bureaucracies of international organizations (IOs). Annual reporting, international organizations (IGOs), International Public Administration, IOM, sentiment analysis, UNHCR, United Nations, UNRWA

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call