Abstract

The tenure of Japanese prime ministers is famously short. Between 2006 and 2012 Japan changed prime minister once a year. What factors can explain Japan’s revolving-door premiership? To explore this puzzle, this article applies the <em>Leadership Capital Index</em> (LCI) developed by Bennister, ’t Hart and Worthy (2015) to case studies of the nine Japanese prime ministers holding office between 2000 and 2015. Leadership capital is the aggregate of leaders’ political resources: skills, relations and reputation. The LCI thus allows analysis of the interplay between individual capacities and contextual conditions in determining leaders’ ability to gain, maintain and deploy power. The LCI is applied to answer two questions. Firstly, what accounts for the short tenure of many Japanese premiers? In which of the LCI’s three leadership dimensions do Japanese leaders lack capital? Secondly, what forms of capital allow some prime ministers to retain office for longer than average (>2 years)? In particular, the article analyses the leadership of Junichiro Koizumi (2001–2006) Japan’s longest serving prime minister since the 1970s, and incumbent Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, who has held office for three years since December 2012. As well as utilising the LCI to comparatively analyse the tenure of Japan’s prime ministers, this article tests the applicability of the Index beyond Western parliamentary democracies.

Highlights

  • The turnover in holders of Japan’s highest office is famously rapid

  • Applying the Leadership Capital Index (LCI) to Japanese leaders reveals a lack of policy vision and an inability to communicate a clear purpose for seeking power as the underlying causes of short tenure in most cases

  • Electoral reform precipitated the decline of factions within the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) that had sustained a senioritybased promotion system requiring potential leaders to hone their political skills in a variety of party positions before reaching the premiership

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The turnover in holders of Japan’s highest office is famously rapid. From 2006 to 2012, six prime ministers served Japan in as many years. To explore the varied fortunes of Japan’s leaders, this article applies the Leadership Capital Index (LCI) developed by Bennister et al (2015) to case studies of the nine Japanese prime ministers holding office be-. Bennister et al employ an analogy between capital and authority to illustrate the difference between mere office holding and exercising political leadership. This article uses the LCI to systematically compare the authority of Japan’s prime ministers in order to answer two questions. What forms of capital allow some Japanese prime ministers to retain office for longer than average (>2 years)? As well as utilising the LCI to comparatively analyse the authority of Japan’s prime ministers, this article tests the applicability of the Index beyond Western parliamentary democracies. I conclude by summarising my answers to the two research questions outlined above and discussing further development of the LCI

Leadership and the Authority of the Japanese Prime Minister
Leadership Capital
Applying the LCI
Explaining Short Tenure
Explaining Long Tenure
The LCI in the Japanese Context
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call