Explaining Differences in Acceptance Determinants Toward Congestion Charging Policies in Indonesia and Japan

Abstract

AbstractComprehensive stated choice (SC) experiments were conducted in Jakarta, Indonesia, and Nagoya, Japan, where proposals for congestion charges have been introduced and remain under consideration as a way to reduce acute car dependence, particularly in Jakarta. Causal paths among psychological determinants and their strengths are measured and analyzed along with proposal acceptability from a cross-country perspective based on the similar context of the SC experiments. The findings from analysis with a multiple-sample, multiple-indicator, multiple-cause (MS-MIMIC) model show that a number of psychological determinants provide an explanation for the acceptability of the proposed scheme in both cities. Psychological motivations, including awareness of the city’s environment and awareness of the problem of cars in society, appear to be the most important direct determinants leading to recognition of the effects of a congestion charging scheme and they are indirect determinants of policy acceptance in bot...