Abstract
In this study, we unpack why a single event affecting a focal firm may be expected to have opposing spillover effects to other related firms. We contextualize our theorization and our specific hypotheses by focusing on how the sudden death of a CEO triggers spillover effects onto other listed firms. We contrast the positive spillover predictions based on competitive interdependence with negative spillover predictions based on entitativity perception due to category similarity. In particular, we examine three key dimensions that may generate both positive and negative spillover effects – size similarity, geographic proximity, and demographic similarity of CEOs. We test our predictions by examining investor reactions of 54,819 firms to the 49 sudden deaths of CEOs between 1993 and 2016. Our results indicate that both spillovers co-exist. Theoretical implications are discussed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.