Abstract

AbstractThis article reports the results of our work to construct a system for the detection of fraudulent behavior in procurement transactions. To solve the problem, we model different types of fraud via separate statistical indicators. We propose a formalized framework to describe the severity of fraud in a unified way regardless of underlying fraud mechanics. Subsequently, we leverage this concept to build indicator ensembles that collect evidence from multiple indicators and deliver an interpretable per transaction score to the procurement audit officer. As a case study, we overview 48 such fraud indicators constructed for our client and describe two examples in detail showing how our formal definitions can be transformed into a practical implementation. The presented results include experiments with all indicators on data covering four years of procurement activity with approximately 216,000 transactions coming from a large government organization in Singapore. The final evaluation of our system shows 67.1% precision in detecting suspicious transactions. The article describes how outcome of our work helped to effectively cope with the problem of anomaly detection explainability and the lessons learned from integrating this solution to operational practices of a procurement department.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call