Abstract
Many states have laws permitting the civil incarceration of violent sexual offenders after they have served their sentence. These laws must balance two strong interests: those of society in preventing the offender from committing further violent sexual offences, and those of the individual whose liberty is curtailed in the fear that he may, in the future, commit another offence. This article reviews the purposes of civil incarceration, and the criteria used in state law permitting it, highlighting the important role played by estimates of the probability that the individual will recidivate. It then examines the methods used to estimate this probability, and the way these methods are presented by experts in court. A comparison of this expert testimony with the Daubert and Frye standards shows how questionable current practice is. We conclude with a discussion of the choices facing society.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
