Abstract
In this paper, we investigate how experts evaluate peer-to-peer (P2P), community self-consumption (CSC), and transactive energy (TE) market models compared to a traditional market model. The different models are evaluated on their capacities to generate different types of values in the electricity market. To facilitate the evaluations, we adopted the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The AHP is a quantitative multiple criteria decision-making tool facilitating experts to make a difficult choice between various options along a set of distinct evaluation criteria by a sequence of pairwise comparisons. So far, the AHP has not yet been applied in the context of energy transaction markets. Results show that experts prefer the community self-consumption and transactive energy market models because they might be most successful in generating green energy. These results help policy makers to better understand the heterogeneous capacities of the market models.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.