Abstract

The emergence of digital traces as potentially new and complex objects in forensic expert science has led to the natural appearance of several errors made by experts in their research. The monitoring and analysis of judicial and expert practice made it possible to formulate the most obvious subjective and objective errors of judicial experts dictated by a number of both external and internal factors. The essence of each of the errors, the content, theoretical and practical significance of their identification and elimination for expert practice and forensic expert science in general are described.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call