Abstract

Chronic non-specific neck pain is highly prevalent, resulting in significant disability. Despite exercise being a mainstay treatment, guidance on optimal exercise and dosage variables is lacking. Combining submaximal effort deep cervical muscles exercise (motor control) and superficial cervical muscles exercise (segmental) reduces chronic non-specific neck pain, but evaluation of optimal exercise and dosage variables is prevented by clinical heterogeneity. To gain consensus on important motor control and segmental exercise and dosage variables for chronic non-specific neck pain. An international 3-round e-Delphi study, was conducted with experts in neck pain management (academic and clinical). In round 1, exercise and dosage variables were obtained from expert opinion and clinical trial data, then analysed thematically (two independent researchers) to develop themes and statements. In rounds 2 and 3, participants rated their agreement with statements (1-5 Likert scale). Statement consensus was evaluated using progressively increased a priori criteria using descriptive statistics. Thirty-seven experts participated (10 countries). Twenty-nine responded to round 1 (79%), 26 round 2 (70%) and 24 round 3 (65%). Round 1 generated 79 statements outlining the interacting components of exercise prescription. Following rounds 2 and 3, consensus was achieved for 46 important components of exercise and dosage prescription across 5 themes (clinical reasoning, dosage variables, exercise variables, evaluation criteria and progression) and 2 subthemes (progression criteria and progression variables). Excellent agreement and qualitative data supports exercise prescription complexity and the need for individualised, acceptable, and feasible exercise. Only 37% of important exercise components were generated from clinical trial data. Agreement was highest (88%-96%) for 3 dosage variables: intensity of effort, frequency, and repetitions. Multiple exercise and dosage variables are important, resulting in complex and individualised exercise prescription not found in clinical trials. Future research should use these important variables to prescribe an evidence-informed approach to exercise.

Highlights

  • Neck pain is highly prevalent, accounting for 22% of all musculoskeletal disorders and is the 3rd leading cause of years lived with disability in the UK [1, 2]

  • Combining submaximal effort deep cervical muscles exercise and superficial cervical muscles exercise reduces chronic non-specific neck pain, but evaluation of optimal exercise and dosage variables is prevented by clinical heterogeneity

  • In round 1, exercise and dosage variables were obtained from expert opinion and clinical trial data, analysed thematically to develop themes and statements

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Neck pain is highly prevalent, accounting for 22% of all musculoskeletal disorders and is the 3rd leading cause of years lived with disability in the UK [1, 2]. The effect of manipulating dosage and other exercise variables in neck pain populations on patient-reported outcome measures is less clear [18]. Experts agree that optimising neck pain exercise through further understanding of exercise and dosage variables is the leading research priority [4, 19]. Chronic non-specific neck pain is highly prevalent, resulting in significant disability. Combining submaximal effort deep cervical muscles exercise (motor control) and superficial cervical muscles exercise (segmental) reduces chronic non-specific neck pain, but evaluation of optimal exercise and dosage variables is prevented by clinical heterogeneity

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call