Abstract
The article analyses several key issues which restrict the effectiveness of fund project peer review work. It analyses the evaluating theory and matter-element theory to access the expert anti-evaluation model, and also studies the expert anti-evaluation index system to support the anti-evaluation method. The practical basis is the true score data of the experts which is collected from the actual anti-evaluation in Liaoning province science and technology fund project peer review system. With the practical experience of the actual project, we prove that the expert index system anti-evaluation model and expert anti-evaluation method can improve the fund project peer review work and play a positive role for the peer review work and also make the review work more scientific and more rational.
Highlights
Science fund is the main method to support the basic research in China, which has a characteristic of “Government funding, macro guide, free application, democracy review” [1]
With the practical experience of the actual project, we prove that the expert index system anti-evaluation model and expert anti-evaluation method can improve the fund project peer review work and play a positive role for the peer review work and make the review work more scientific and more rational
With the practical experience of the actual project, we prove that the expert index system anti-evaluation model and expert anti-evaluation method can improve the peer review system and play a positive role for the work of the peer review and make the review work more scientific and more rational
Summary
Science fund is the main method to support the basic research in China, which has a characteristic of “Government funding, macro guide, free application, democracy review” [1]. In the scientific and technological project evaluation works of China, there are still many problems in peer review system. Such as, the difference of expert judgments and evaluating standard; the difference of academic field and academic level; the contradictory between different schools of thought; different self-cultivation between scientists and so on. There are two most important factors in the fund project anti-evaluation system of peer review, expert index system and effectiveness evaluation method. The practical basis is the true score data of the experts which is collected from the actual anti-evaluation in Liaoning province science and technology fund project peer review system.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
