Abstract
Abstract The Gandin optimal analysis scheme leaves open the problem of determining the covariance matrix on which it depends. The choice of an autocorrelation function for geopotential, from which geostrophically consistent cross-correlations—and thus covariances—for heights and winds may be derived, influences the performance of the analysis. Four related functions are considered for representation of height field autocorrelations. They are compared on the basis of spectral behavior, capacity to conform with geostrophy, and accuracy of analyses employing them. A multivariate objective analysis test, with both regular and irregular configurations of predictor stations, compares performance of analyses based on modeled covariances with performance of an analysis using observed sample covariances.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
