Experiments on the cohesion of mortar

Abstract

Micro-invasive resin-infiltration has shown to inhibit lesion progression of proximal non-cavitated carious lesions, suggesting an alternative to early operative treatment. This split-mouth, randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluated the effects of proximal lesion infiltration supplementary to standard-of-care management in high caries risk (HCR)-patients.Forty-two HCR-subjects with two similar interproximal posterior lesions received professional HCR-regimen including repeated F-varnish applications. Two affected E2/D1-surfaces were randomized and concurrently treated by resin-infiltration or mock-infiltration (control). Individually standardized digital radiographs provided visual determination of lesion-size distribution at baseline and 2-year follow-up. Data were analyzed by logistic regression and McNemar’s test.Thirty-two lesion pairs (76%) were evaluated after 2 years. Categorical lesion depths were not different between groups (P > .5). Comparative pairwise assessment (image sets BL-2 yr) showed significantly more progression in control (7) versus infiltration (1) lesions (P = .035). Cumulative prevented fraction after two years was 97% for infiltrated lesions versus 74% for control lesions.Two-year follow-up showed resin infiltration to be a highly efficacious (RRR: 86–89%) therapy. Long-term follow-up is needed to strengthen the evidence for efficacy of resin-infiltration as an adjunct to standard-of-care HCR-regimen including F-varnish.Showing 24% more stabilized lesions, the resin-infiltrated group performed significantly better than their controls, confirming successful early lesion management. Adjunct resin-infiltration provided an effective micro-invasive approach to inhibit short-term lesion progression.