Abstract

My aim is to question whether the introduction of new technologies in society may be considered to be genuine experiments. I will argue that they are not, at least not in the sense in which the notion of experiment is being used in the natural and social sciences. If the introduction of a new technology in society is interpreted as an experiment, then we are dealing with a notion of experiment that differs in an important respect from the notion of experiment as used in the natural and social sciences. This difference shows itself most prominently when the functioning of the new technological system is not only dependent on technological hardware but also on social ‘software’, that is, on social institutions such as appropriate laws, and actions of operators of the new technological system. In those cases we are not dealing with ‘simply’ the introduction of a new technology, but with the introduction of a new socio-technical system. I will argue that if the introduction of a new socio-technical system is considered to be an experiment, then the relation between the experimenter and the system on which the experiment is performed differs significantly from the relation in traditional experiments in the natural and social sciences. In the latter experiments it is assumed that the experimenter is not part of the experimental system and is able to intervene in and control the experimental system from the outside. With regard to the introduction of new socio-technical systems the idea that there is an experimenter outside the socio-technical system who intervenes in and controls that system becomes problematic. From that perspective we are dealing with a different kind of experiment.

Highlights

  • Following Martin and Schinzinger (1989) the introduction of new technologies in society has often been interpreted as performing experiments on society

  • Experiments are performed to learn and so treating technological innovations as experiments calls for a close monitoring of the societal effects of a new technology; without a close monitoring nothing will be learned about the possible effects of new technologies

  • If the introduction of a new technology in society is interpreted as an experiment, we are dealing with a notion of experiment that differs in an important respect from the notion of experiment as used in the natural and social sciences

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Following Martin and Schinzinger (1989) the introduction of new technologies in society has often been interpreted as performing experiments on society. I will argue that if the introduction of a new socio-technical system is considered to be an experiment, the relation between the experimenter and the system on which the experiment is performed differs significantly from the relation in traditional experiments in the natural and social sciences. In the latter experiments it is assumed that the experimenter is not part of the experimental system and is able to intervene in and control the experimental system from the outside. Discussions about the possibility or desirability of the application of the traditional moral requirement of informed consent to technological innovations as experiments on society will have to take into account this difference in the kinds of experiments

Experiments and Control in the Natural Sciences
Experiments and Control in the Social Sciences
The Traditional Control Paradigm for Experiments
Problems with the Control Paradigm
Findings
Laboratory experiment
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call