Abstract

K-means is one of the most popular data mining and unsupervised learning algorithms that solve the well known clustering problem. The procedure follows a simple and easy way to classify a given data set through a pre-specified number of clusters K, therefore the problem of determining "the right number of clusters" has attracted considerable interest. However, to the authors' knowledge, no experimental results of their comparison have been reported so far. This paper presents results of such a comparison involving eight selection options presenting four approaches. We generate data according to a Gaussian-mixture distribution with clusters' spread and spatial sizes variant. Most consistent results are shown by the least squares and least modules version of an intelligent version of the method, iK-Means by Mirkin [14]. However, the right K is reproduced best by the Hartigan's [5] method. This leads us to propose an adjusted iK-Means method, which performs well in the current experiment setting.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.