Abstract

This paper analyzes the interactions between the European Union’s Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT) initiative and other components of the emerging transnational timber legality regime, both public and private. It examines how far, and through what institutional channels and mechanisms, these interactions are producing a joined-up transnational regime, based on a shared normative commitment to combat illegal logging and cooperative efforts to implement and enforce it. The paper argues that the experimentalist architecture of the EU FLEGT initiative has fostered productive, mutually reinforcing interactions both with public timber legality regulation in other consumer countries and with private certification schemes. But this emerging regime remains highly polyarchic, with broad scope for autonomous initatives by NGOs and private service providers, along with national governments, international organizations, and multi-donor partnerships. Hence horizontal integration and coordination within it depend on a series of institutional mechanisms, some of which are distinctively experimentalist, while others can also be found in more conventional regimes. These mechanisms include cross-referencing and reciprocal endorsement of rules and standards; mutual learning and peer review through information pooling and comparison of enforcement approaches; public oversight and joint assessment of private certification and legality verification schemes; and the “penalty default” effect of public regulation in consumer countries, which have pushed both exporting countries and transnational firms to comply with the norms and procedures of the emerging transnational regime. The findings of this paper thus provide robust new evidence for the claim advanced in previous work that a joined-up transnational regime can be assembled piece-by-piece under polyarchic conditions through coordinated learning from decentralized experimentation, without a hegemonic power to impose common global rules.

Highlights

  • Over the past 15 years, something approaching a joined-up transnational timber legality regime has progressively emerged from the intersection of multiple public and private initiatives across different geographical regions and levels of governance

  • As we have argued elsewhere (Overdevest 2014, 2018), the EU FLEGT initiative is built around an experimentalist governance architecture, based on extensive participation by public and private stakeholders in establishing and revising open-ended framework goals and metrics for assessing progress towards them through continuous monitoring and regular review of local implementation, underpinned by a penalty default to sanction non-cooperation

  • There is no hierarchical relationship between the main components of the timber legality regime complex, we argue in this paper that that it does have an identifiable core, in the form of the EU FLEGT initiative, whose experimentalist governance architecture plays a crucial role in fostering the development of a joined-up transnational regime

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Over the past 15 years, something approaching a joined-up transnational timber legality regime has progressively emerged from the intersection of multiple public and private initiatives across different geographical regions and levels of governance. This paper is based on exhaustive documentary research on materials produced by the principal institutions comprising the transnational timber legality regime complex, including the EU, national governments, international organizations, transgovernmental networks, NGOs, business associations, and think tanks, together with participation in a variety of expert and stakeholder meetings. It draws more than 100 interviews with public officials, civil society activists, business leaders, consultants, and independent experts in the EU, Ghana, and Indonesia conducted since 2011.1 In this paper, we limit our references to individual interviews to support for specific factual and interpretive claims

Characterizing the Transnational Timber Legality Regime
EU FLEGT as the Experimentalist Core of the Transnational Timber
The FLEGT VPAs
The EU Timber Regulation
Experimentalist Interactions
China: Integrating the Elephant in the Room
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call