Abstract

Leishmaniasis is a typical parasite infection whose protective immunity depends on macrophage activation. Susceptibility to Leishmania donovani infection was compared in H (high antibody responder) and L (low antibody responder) mice from selection IV-A. H mice infected intravenously with 10(7) amastigotes of L. donovani were more susceptible to infection than their L counterparts. This higher susceptibility was characterized by a higher splenic and hepatic parasite burden. An increased splenic index was observed in both lines after sixty days of infection. This splenomegaly was caused, at least partially, by an increase in the number of splenic cells as determined by direct counts of cells from spleen. The results show that selection IV-A is susceptible to visceral leishmaniasis, with the H line being more susceptible than the L line.

Highlights

  • Leishmaniasis is a typical parasite infection whose protective immunity depends on macrophage activation

  • Considering that L. donovani is an intracellular parasite and that the macrophage function is altered in selection IV-A, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the susceptibility of H and L mice from selection IV-A to infection with L. donovani

  • Liver parasite counts on the first day showed no difference between H and L mice, with 138 LeishmanDonovan Units (LDU) being the mean count for both lines

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Leishmaniasis is a typical parasite infection whose protective immunity depends on macrophage activation. Susceptibility to Leishmania donovani infection was compared in H (high antibody responder) and L (low antibody responder) mice from selection IV-A. Selection IV-A was derived from F2 interline segregants between HIV and LIV lines in response to SE9 This approach has permitted to establish that quantitative antibody production is a polygenic trait regulated by a group of about 10 independent loci[2 14]. Low antibody responses in Lmice have been attributed to higher catabolism of immunogens in the macrophages and consequent decreased antigen presentation by these cells. These macrophage catabolic differences have been previously demonstrated in selections I, II and IV-A16

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.