Abstract

A spherical wave AVO response is investigated by measuring ultrasonic reflection amplitudes from a water/Plexiglas interface. The experimental results show substantial deviation from the plane‐wave reflection coefficients at large angles. However there is an excellent agreement between experimental data and full‐wave numerical simulations performed with the reflectivity algorithm. By comparing the spherical‐wave AVO response, modeled with different frequencies, to the plane‐wave response, we show that the differences between the two are of such magnitude that three‐term AVO inversion based on the AVA curvature can be erroneous. We then propose an alternative approach to use critical angle information extracted from AVA curves, and show that this leads to a significant improvement of the estimation of elastic parameters.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call