Abstract
Nonlinearities from any periodic magnet in accelerators may strongly degrade the dynamics of the beams. This may be especially critical for magnets where the beam excursions are comparable to the good field region, as for example in wigglers, since the beam trajectory can be of the order of the pole width. A general method based on alternately shifting the magnetic axis of each pole to compensate this effect was proposed and applied to the $\mathrm{DA}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}\mathrm{NE}$ wigglers, where an important integrated octupole was measured. This approach has been optimized by multipolar analyses and the effect on the beam dynamics verified by tracking studies. In this paper we report about the experimental validation of the magnetic model and the verification of the method by beam based measurements. The latter were performed after all the wigglers in the $\mathrm{DA}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Phi}}\mathrm{NE}$ main rings had been modified according to the optimal configuration. These measurements were in agreement with the expectations and allowed experimentally proving the method.
Highlights
Wigglers are normally installed in synchrotron light source machines, damping rings and particle factories to increase the radiation damping and control the emittance
In particular in the damping rings of the International Linear Collider (ILC) [1] and Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) [2] a large number of wigglers is installed for these reasons
Wiggler nonlinearities may strongly degrade the beam dynamics especially if the beam excursion is comparable to the pole width, as is typical for conventional wigglers
Summary
Wigglers are normally installed in synchrotron light source machines, damping rings and particle factories to increase the radiation damping and control the emittance. The second approach may be useful only if one specific order has to be compensated and if the correction is small enough that the other orders are not significantly distorted by the jaw. This technique is not optimal for long wigglers because it corrects the nonlinearities only at the end of the device. A validation of the 3D modeling by 2D magnetic field map measurements in the midplane is described in Sec. III B.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.