Abstract

Introduction: Man-machine interfacing remains the main challenge for accurate and reliable control of bionic prostheses. Implantable electrodes in nerves and muscles may overcome some of the limitations by significantly increasing the interface's reliability and bandwidth. Before human application, experimental preclinical testing is essential to assess chronic in-vivo biocompatibility and functionality. Here, we analyze available animal models, their costs and ethical challenges in special regards to simulating a potentially life-long application in a short period of time and in non-biped animals.Methods: We performed a literature analysis following the PRISMA guidelines including all animal models used to record neural or muscular activity via implantable electrodes, evaluating animal models, group size, duration, origin of publication as well as type of interface. Furthermore, behavioral, ethical, and economic considerations of these models were analyzed. Additionally, we discuss experience and surgical approaches with rat, sheep, and primate models and an approach for international standardized testing.Results: Overall, 343 studies matched the search terms, dominantly originating from the US (55%) and Europe (34%), using mainly small animal models (rat: 40%). Electrode placement was dominantly neural (77%) compared to muscular (23%). Large animal models had a mean duration of 135 ± 87.2 days, with a mean of 5.3 ± 3.4 animals per trial. Small animal models had a mean duration of 85 ± 11.2 days, with a mean of 12.4 ± 1.7 animals.Discussion: Only 37% animal models were by definition chronic tests (>3 months) and thus potentially provide information on long-term performance. Costs for large animals were up to 45 times higher than small animals. However, costs are relatively small compared to complication costs in human long-term applications. Overall, we believe a combination of small animals for preliminary primary electrode testing and large animals to investigate long-term biocompatibility, impedance, and tissue regeneration parameters provides sufficient data to ensure long-term human applications.

Highlights

  • Man-machine interfacing remains the main challenge for accurate and reliable control of bionic prostheses

  • Relevant studies were screened for inclusion criteria, which included all studies describing animal models for testing bionic interfaces or electrodes connected to peripheral nerve or muscle

  • Testing of new devices is important to improve the components of future bionic interfaces

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Man-machine interfacing remains the main challenge for accurate and reliable control of bionic prostheses. A main goal of current research has been to improve the man-machine interface, which remains the main challenge for intuitive control causing high abandonment rates (Biddiss and Chau, 2007) In this undertaking, the realistic and chronic simulation of a long-term application is a key aspect to any successful development, which requires experimental testing in animal models. Sensory feedback is obtained by converting sensor information from the prosthesis into signals detectable by the human body For both control and sensory feedback, standard surface electrodes suffer significant limitations, which may potentially be solved by implantable interfaces (OrtizCatalan et al, 2012; Farina and Aszmann, 2014). For prosthetic control the risk-benefit-ratio may not be as favorable, since the available 1–2 channels are insufficient (Onders et al, 2018)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call