Abstract

Long tail feathers of the barn swallow Hirundo rustica are a classic example of an intersexually selected trait, but previous aerodynamic analyses indicate that the tail feather is only 10–12 mm longer than the aerodynamic optimum even in the nominate subspecies with long tails. Here, by experimentally shortening female tail length, we studied the feeding cost of long tail feathers in Japanese barn swallows, Hirundo rustica gutturalis, which have ca. 10 mm shorter tails than the nominate subspecies. Female feeding rate was explained by the interaction between treatment and original female tail length: feeding rate decreased with decreasing original female tail length in control, but not in tail-shortened females. Because the interaction term was far from significant in the analysis of female incubation investment, the observed pattern would be specific to feeding rate, which is greatly affected by the aerodynamic properties associated with tail length. Differential allocation of paternal feeding investment was not observed in the current data set. Long tails would be costly at least in short-tailed females, supporting differential costs of ornamentation as predicted by sexual selection theory. Female outermost tail feathers are costly ornamentation in short-tailed Japanese barn swallows.

Highlights

  • Long outermost tail feathers of the barn swallow Hirundo rustica are a classic example of an intersexually selected trait (Andersson 1994)

  • A series of manipulative experiments suggest that outermost tail feathers of European barn swallows, H. r. rustica, are 10–12 mm longer than the aerodynamic optimum (Evans 1998; Buchanan and Evans 2000; Rowe et al 2001)

  • The interaction between treatment and original female tail length was not significant when added to the model (F = 1.89, P = 0.19, Max VIF = 4.54)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Long outermost tail feathers of the barn swallow Hirundo rustica are a classic example of an intersexually selected trait (Andersson 1994). Rustica, are 10–12 mm longer than the aerodynamic optimum (Evans 1998; Buchanan and Evans 2000; Rowe et al 2001). Based on these studies, one may argue that sexually selected component of tail length is only a small portion of the tail feather One may argue that sexually selected component of tail length is only a small portion of the tail feather As Norberg (1994) already noted, experimental manipulation of tail length upsets an original co-adapted character set, and may not reveal the aerodynamic function of

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call