Abstract
AbstractWe empirically test our earlier theoretical arguments about simplification of continuous‐time random walk (CTRW) solute transport models, namely that without loss of generality the velocity‐like term, vψ, may be set to mean groundwater velocity, the dispersion‐like term, Dψ, defined by a classical, velocity‐independent dispersivity, and the so‐called time constant, τ, to unity. We also argue that for small‐scale heterogeneous advection (HA) and mobile‐immobile mass transfer (MIMT) CTRW transition time distributions, ψ(t), are unaffected by mean flow velocity. To experimentally test these claims, we re‐analyze two bench‐scale transport experiments—one for HA, one for MIMT—each performed at multiple flow rates in otherwise identical conditions, and show it is possible to simultaneously explain all breakthrough curves in each, subject to the above constraints. We compare our calibrations with earlier efforts for the same data sets. In the HA calibration we identify a ψ(t) of the same functional form as previous authors, and which yielded breakthrough predictions essentially identical to theirs, but with greatly differing parameters. This illustrates how values of individual CTRW parameters may not map one‐to‐one onto underlying physics. We recommend reporting complete model descriptions, discuss how the simplified approach assists in this and other theoretical considerations.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.