Abstract
Reactor performance of bubbling fluidized bed (BFB) and turbulent fluidized bed (TFB) was carefully examined and systematically compared using catalytic ozone decomposition as a model reaction, based on a complete mapping of local flow structures and spatial distributions of ozone conversion and solids holdup. TFB clearly has a higher conversion and shows better reactor performance than BFB as a result of the vigorously turbulent flow and the relatively homogeneous gas–solids mixing in TEB. Besides, the intensive interaction between gas and solids in TFB leads to greater gas–solids contact efficiency of TFB over that of BFB. Due to gas bypassing and backmixing caused by bubbling behaviours and two-phase structure, BFB deviates significantly from a plug flow reactor and sometimes from a continuously stirred tank reactor. The flow structures essentially dictate the reactor performance in the low-velocity fluidized beds.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
