Abstract

In order to find the optimal combination of the picking unit parameters of the brush-rolling cotton harvester, the parameters optimization experiment were carried out. Taking the rotary speed of brush roller, the working velocity, and the number of brush plates as the experimental factors, the collect rate and the loss rate of struck cotton as the performance evaluation indexes, the quadratic regression orthogonal rotational combing design experiment was carried out. The Central Composite Design response surface method was used to establish the regression model of experimental factors and evaluation indexes, and analyze the influence of each factor on evaluation indexes. Using multi-objective optimization, the optimal parameter combination is as follows: the rotary speed of the brush roller is 350 r/min, the working velocity is 0.5 m/s, the number of brush plates is 6 rows. After the optimization test, the collect rate is 95.58%, and the loss rate of struck cotton is 1.22%. The field verification test shows that the collect rate of 4MSG-3 brush-rolling cotton harvester is 92.86%, and the loss rate of struck cotton is 1.26%. The relative error between verification test results and parameter optimization value is less than 5%, which verifies the reliability of the regression model. This study provides a theoretical basis for optimizing and improving the picking unit’s parameters of the brush-rolling cotton harvester.

Highlights

  • This paper describes the structure and working principle of the picking unit of the cotton harvester

  • The picking unit consists of a pair of brush rollers arranged in parallel with a certain distance and inclined to the ground at a certain angle

  • The gap between the brush rollers forms a picking channel, and two sides of the picking channel are equipped with cotton conveying augers

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The gap between the brush rollers forms a picking channel, and two sides of the picking channel are equipped with cotton conveying augers. 1.Hydraulic motor; 2.Transmission system; 3.Brush roller; 4.Conveying auger; 5.Picking channel; 6.Frame Fig. 2.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call