Abstract

Concrete bridge structures require reinforcement, as their performance deteriorates over time. In this regard, this study evaluated the effect of additional prestressing using fiber-reinforced polymers (FRPs) and strands applied to a demolished, deteriorated bridge. In particular, specimens were prepared for a bridge subjected to non-, near-surface mounted (NSM), and external prestressing (EP) strengthening to evaluate the stiffness and safety of the structure. In the 200–400 kN load range, the EP method exhibited the highest stiffness (15 kN/mm), followed by non-strengthening (8.5 kN/mm) and the NSM method (5.45 kN/mm). The EP method increased the stiffness by approximately two times; however, the NSM method decreased the stiffness by 0.6 times. In the 400–800 kN load range, the EP and NSM methods yielded stiffness values of 2.58 and 0.7 kN/mm, respectively. These results confirm that the EP method reinforces the structure. The results of this study are expected to be used as basic data to reinforce deteriorated bridges in actual operation.

Highlights

  • Among reinforced concrete (RC) and prestressed concrete (PSC) structures, bridge structures have recently been exhibiting rapid performance degradation in terms of their usability and stability owing to the corrosion of steel [1,2]

  • Reinforcement is performed to restore or improve the mechanical performance of members or structures, such as their load-carrying capacity and stiffness [9]

  • Given that the performance of internal steel materials deteriorates over time in deteriorated bridges, an additional prestressing method can be applied for reinforcement to increase the stiffness of members, and the material substitution method can be adopted to prevent the corrosion of steel [9]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Among reinforced concrete (RC) and prestressed concrete (PSC) structures, bridge structures have recently been exhibiting rapid performance degradation in terms of their usability and stability owing to the corrosion of steel [1,2]. Given that the performance of internal steel materials deteriorates over time in deteriorated bridges, an additional prestressing method can be applied for reinforcement to increase the stiffness of members, and the material substitution method can be adopted to prevent the corrosion of steel [9]. The EP method increased the stiffness by approximately two times, but the NSM method decreased the stiffness by 0.6 times These strengthening methods were previously studied mainly based on models or small-scale structures. Polymers 2022, 14, 1115 but the NSM method decreased the stiffness by 0.6 times The results of this study could be used to develop a database that can be used dfoemr roeliinshfoerdc.eTmheenrtessautltcsoonfstrhuisctsitoundsyitceosuilndtbheeufusetudrteo. develop a database that can be used for reinforcements at construction sites in the future

Materials and Methods
Prestressing in NSM Method
Analysis before Applying EP Method
Analysis after Reinforcement via EP Method
Analysis after Reinforcement via NSM Method
Comparison of

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.