Abstract

Currently, various types of software compensations are applied to machine tools. Their aim is to increase the working accuracy of the tools. The improvement in working accuracy is then further assessed according to the increase in the dimensional and shape accuracy or the surface quality of the workpiece. This publication describes the effects of the volumetric accuracy of a machine tool on the working accuracy of a workpiece, where total roundness (RONt) is evaluated in multiple cuts. In the experiment, two test workpieces are manufactured on a three-axis milling machining centre. The first is made using a standard machine setup while the second with activated volumetric compensation. The LaserTRACER self-tracking laser interferometer is used to compensate for volumetric accuracy. In the second part, verification measurements are performed with a Ballbar, where roundness error is evaluated according to ISO 230-4. Then two test workpieces are machined, and, in the last part, measurement is performed on Talyrond 595S roundness measuring equipment. Finally, the results are analysed and the dependence between the volumetric accuracy, the circularity error of the machine and the working accuracy of the CNC machine tool is established, represented by the RONt of the workpiece. This paper presents new and unpublished relations between the volumetric accuracy of the machine tool and the RONt of the workpiece.

Highlights

  • The increase of the production accuracy of machine tools is a continuous process with the involvement of all manufacturers

  • This section describes the results obtained by measuring the volumetric and geometric accuracy of the CNC machine tool and the roundness error of the workpieces

  • The results show that volumetric error decreased significantly, from 49 μm to 14 μm

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The increase of the production accuracy of machine tools is a continuous process with the involvement of all manufacturers. Production accuracy is a machine feature that is an indicator of competitiveness; its continuous improvement is required by the machine users themselves. The percentage of quasi-static errors and the resulting accuracy of the three-axis machine tool was described in 2000 by Ramesh [1]. Ibaraki expanded this hypothesis in his 2010 publication [2] with up to 80% for five-axis machine tools. The increase in the proportion of quasi-static errors is caused by the kinematic pair of rotary axes of five-axis machines

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call