Abstract
The overall heat transfer coefficient, pressure drop, and the fouling thermal resistance were compared between a clean and a seawater-exposed, fouled plate-frame heat exchanger. The fouled heat exchanger was utilized for heat recovery from the seawater-effluent for 3 months at a powerplant site. The performance tests were conducted at temperatures of 20 °C and 30 °C on the fouled-side, while the corresponding temperatures on the clean-side were 15 °C and 25 °C, respectively. Flow rate ranged from 20 to 40 l·min−1 on the fouled-side and the clean-side of the heat exchanger. In the absence of fouling, the average U value was higher than that under the fouling condition by 21.3 %. The average thermal resistance ranged from 0.135 m2·K·kW−1 to 0.157 m2·K·kW−1. The pressure drop was less than 2 kPa with the change of temperature, but the pressure drop of the fouled-side increased by 400 % compared with that of the clean-side.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
