Abstract

To address the challenges associated with significant thermal disturbance and carbon emissions resulting from the conventional stabilization of frozen soil using cement, geopolymer material is used to replace cement to stabilize frozen soil. The unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of the geopolymer stabilized soil was investigated in relation to the proportions of metakaolin (MK), calcium carbide slag (CCS), curing temperature, and curing age. Microscopic analysis was conducted to unveil the stabilized mechanism. The UCS, shear strength, thermal conductivity, hydration products and microstructure of geopolymer stabilized soil and cement soil were compared in parallel. A total of 240 experiments were conducted in this study. The outcomes indicate that the optimal content of MK and CCS is 10% and 6% respectively. The UCS of samples with the optimal content after 28d of curing at 20 °C, −2 °C, and − 10 °C are 3.783 MPa, 1.164 MPa, and 0.901 MPa respectively. The primary causes of the rise in UCS of the geopolymer stabilized soil are the production of amorphous calcium silicate hydrate and calcium aluminate hydrate gel as a result of the stimulation of MK based geopolymer with CCS. The UCS of the geopolymer stabilized soil decreases with a decrease in curing temperature. In frozen conditions, the expansion of ice crystals in the soil creates voids and promotes crack growth, leading to a decrease in the efficiency of geopolymerization reactions. After 28d of curing at room temperature and low temperature, the geopolymer stabilized soil with the optimal content exhibits higher UCS, failure strain, shear strength, cohesion, and internal friction angle compared to the cement soil. At all curing temperatures and ages, the geopolymer stabilized soil has a lower thermal conductivity than the cement soil. The geopolymer stabilized soil is less susceptible to low temperature curing than cement soil, demonstrating a larger amount of hydration products and a denser microstructure, according to experimental results from XRD and SEM. The results of this work offer a theoretical foundation for using geopolymer in place of cement to stabilize soils in permafrost regions.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call