Experimental Study of the Effect of Backfill Conditions on Soil Responses around a Pipeline under Wave–Current Load

Abstract

Waves and currents coexist widely in the ocean, and the interaction of waves and currents plays an important role in the instability of submarine pipelines. So far, most studies have concentrated on discussing the dynamic reaction within the seabed around a pipeline under pure wave action, monotypic sediment, and an exposed or fully buried condition. In this study, the effect of current characteristics (e.g., current velocity and propagation direction) and backfilling conditions (e.g., backfill depth and sand property) on the dynamic response around the submarine pipeline is investigated by conducting laboratory experiments. Pipeline was buried in the excavated trench using three types of sand with the median size of 0.150 mm, 0.300 mm and 0.045 mm, respectively. Five relative backfilled depths, with the ratios of backfill depth over the pipeline diameter being 0, 1/2, 1, 3/2 and 2, were tested. The excess pore pressure was measured simultaneously by using the pore pressure sensors installed around the pipeline surface and beneath the pipeline. Results show that both the pore pressure amplitude and its descent rate gradually decrease with an increasing backfill depth, which decreases the soil liquefaction potential. Under the co-current actions, the decrease rate of the pore pressure along the vertical direction increases with an increasing current velocity. However, the increased current velocity leads to a decrease of the attenuation rate under the counter-current actions compared with the pure wave actions, and the counter-current effect on the pore pressure within the seabed is greater than the co-current. The results indicate that the dynamic response around the pipeline in coarse sand is close to that without the backfill scenario, even if the backfill depth reaches up to two times that of the pipeline diameter. It is found that the larger the median particle size of backfill sand, the smaller the impact on pore pressure within the seabed beneath the pipeline.