Abstract
Previous investigations have demonstrated that strong earthquakes can cause severe damage or collapse of storage tanks. Theoretical studies by other researchers have shown that using energy-dissipating anchors can reduce the axial compressive stresses in the tank shell compared to the fully anchored case. Those studies have also shown that using energy-dissipating anchors can reduce the displacement of the tank compared to the unanchored case. However, there is no experimental work to validate the results obtained from these numerical studies. This paper reports on a series of experiments using a shake table on a scale model PVC tank containing water. A comparison of the seismic behaviour of a fully fixed base system (tank with anchorage), a system free to uplift (tank without anchorage) and a partially fixed system (tank with slip-friction connectors) is presented. The slip-friction connectors are calibrated by performing cyclic tests. The experiments were performed using recorded ground motion scaled to the New Zealand design spectra for two Wellington sites. Measurements were made of the axial compressive stresses in the tank shell and the horizontal displacement of the top of the tank. The experiments showed the beneficial effects of using slip-friction connectors in storage tanks, reducing the uplift displacement in comparison with an unanchored tank and reducing the axial stresses compared to a fully fixed tank. A numerical model is proposed which corroborates these results.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.