Abstract
Twelve reinforced masonry wall specimens with nominal dimensions of 2400 mm × 800 mm × 150 mm were tested under eccentric compressive loading with varying eccentricity to thickness ratios, e/t, and end eccentricity ratios, e1/e2. Pinned-pinned support conditions resulted in a slenderness ratio of 17.1 for all specimens. Test results showed that the variation of ultimate load, Pu, and effective modulus of rigidity values, EIeff, at failure depended on the type of failure mode, which was influenced by e/t and e1/e2ratios and their interaction. Comparing ultimate loads obtained by test against those calculated using the EIeffvalues from the Canadian standard CSA S304.1-04 and against the ones calculated using the EIeffvalues proposed herein indicates that, while the moment magnifier method used in the current Canadian design standard to account for secondary effects is effective, the standard underestimates EIeffvalues, especially in regions where compression-controlled failure tends to predominate and, thus, leads to a conservative design. However, the use of proposed EIeffvalues in combination with the moment magnifier method provides estimations of ultimate loads in reasonably good agreement with test results.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.