Abstract

Polymer flooding and surfactant/polymer flooding (SP flooding) were mainly focused on the improvement in oil–water flow ratio and the reduction in oil–water interfacial tension. Preformed particle gel (PPG) flooding was mainly focused on the reservoir heterogeneity improvement. Each of these technologies has its own limitations. Heterogeneous system flooding (HS–PP flooding) was proposed as a novel flooding method aimed to improve oil–water flow ratio and reservoir heterogeneity at the same time. The HS–PP flooding system was composed of PPG and polymer solution. HS–PP flooding, polymer flooding and SP flooding as different chemical EOR methods were studied in laboratory in physical simulation heterogeneous model. Property of cubic expansion of PPG was researched by laser particle analyzer. The result shows that cubic expansion of PPG in simulation water is obvious and can be controlled. The effect of PPG on the diversion rate modification in double parallel sandstone model was obvious. The oil displacement experiments of the three different flooding systems with the same viscosity in physical simulation heterogeneous model were studied. The results show that the HS–PP flooding improves the oil recovery by 20.04%, comparing the result of 12.67% for polymer flooding and 16.66% for SP flooding, respectively. HS–PP flooding as a novel flooding method shows an excellent ability for stabilizing oil production and controlling water cut. The mechanism of the HS–PP flooding was discussed briefly. In addition to the viscoelastic displacement of polymers, the special circulation ability of “accumulating–deforming (collapsing)–accumulating again” of PPG is the main reason why the HS–PP flooding shows an excellent property for stabilizing oil production and controlling water cut.

Highlights

  • As most of the major oil fields in China have entered high water cut stage, technology having the characteristics of stabilizing oil production and controlling water cut has become increasingly important (Willhite and Pancake 2008; He et al 2009; Wei (2013); Hendraningrat and Zhang 2015; Li et al 2015)

  • The Preformed particle gel (PPG) particle size tends to be stable after 15 days

  • Based on the same recovery of water flooding, oil recovery enhanced by HS–PP flooding was 20.04% compared with 12.67% by polymer flooding and 16.66% by SP flooding, respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As most of the major oil fields in China have entered high water cut stage, technology having the characteristics of stabilizing oil production and controlling water cut has become increasingly important (Willhite and Pancake 2008; He et al 2009; Wei (2013); Hendraningrat and Zhang 2015; Li et al 2015). Polymer flooding and polymer/surfactant flooding (SP flooding) are currently the most widely used chemical flooding technologies (Shah and Schechter 1977; Needham and Doe 1987). Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology (2020) 10:481–485 chemical EOR methods were studied in laboratory in physical simulation heterogeneous model. The mechanism of the HS–PP flooding was discussed briefly. This paper is helpful for practical application of HS–PP flooding in oil field

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.