Abstract

In materials sciences, a large amount of research data is generated through a broad spectrum of different experiments. As of today, experimental research data including meta-data in materials science is often stored decentralized by the researcher(s) conducting the experiments without generally accepted standards on what and how to store data. The conducted research and experiments often involve a considerable investment from public funding agencies that desire the results to be made available in order to increase their impact. In order to achieve the goal of citable and (openly) accessible materials science experimental research data in the future, not only an adequate infrastructure needs to be established but the question of how to measure the quality of the experimental research data also to be addressed. In this publication, the authors identify requirements and challenges towards a systematic methodology to measure experimental research data quality prior to publication and derive different approaches on that basis. These methods are critically discussed and assessed by their contribution and limitations towards the set goals. Concluding, a combination of selected methods is presented as a systematic, functional and practical quality measurement and assurance approach for experimental research data in materials science with the goal of supporting the accessibility and dissemination of existing data sets.

Highlights

  • The topic of data quality gains importance due to various factors such the rapid development of the so-called “big data” movement (Lohr, 2012; Aggrawal, 2013; Küll, 2013; Lycett, 2013; Kwon, Lee, & Shin, 2014), increasing automation of manufacturing systems, and developments in Information and Communication Technology (ICT)

  • This is where this publication seeks to make a contribution by first presenting the specifications of experimental research data per se and focus on the domain of materials science, followed by a section elaborating on data quality and the special requirements of experimental research data with respect to data quality

  • After looking into the specific meaning of data quality for materials science experimental research data, requirements for research data quality assurance approaches for information infrastructures were derived

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The topic of data quality gains importance due to various factors such the rapid development of the so-called “big data” movement (Lohr, 2012; Aggrawal, 2013; Küll, 2013; Lycett, 2013; Kwon, Lee, & Shin, 2014), increasing automation of manufacturing systems, and developments in Information and Communication Technology (ICT) With this development, practitioners and academics in various domains (Ozmen-Ertekin & Ozbay, 2012) have to face the challenge of ensuring the quality of generated or captured data. As scientific data are in many cases very heterogeneous and can even be based on unique experimental designs, it is quite difficult to assess and measure data quality This is where this publication seeks to make a contribution by first presenting the specifications of experimental research data per se and focus on the domain of materials science, followed by a section elaborating on data quality and the special requirements of experimental research data with respect to data quality. The final section provides a short conclusion and an outlook on this important topic

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.