Abstract

Strain, an important biomechanical factor, occurs at different scales from molecules and cells to tissues and organs in physiological conditions. Under mechanical strain, the strength of tissues and their micro- and nanocomponents, the structure, proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis of cells and even the cytokines expressed by cells probably shift. Thus, the measurement of mechanical strain (i.e., relative displacement or deformation) is critical to understand functional changes in tissues, and to elucidate basic relationships between mechanical loading and tissue response. In the last decades, a great number of methods have been developed and applied to measure the deformations and mechanical strains in tissues comprising bone, tendon, ligament, muscle and brain as well as blood vessels. In this article, we have reviewed the mechanical strain measurement from six aspects: electro-based, light-based, ultrasound-based, magnetic resonance-based and computed tomography-based techniques, and the texture correlation-based image processing method. The review may help solving the problems of experimental and mechanical strain measurement of tissues under different measurement environments.

Highlights

  • Strain is an important mechanical factor that affects strain-associated biological function

  • The strain in tissues induced by mechanical loading can produce fluid flow which influences cells inside the tissues, just as we reviewed before about osteoblasts (Huang et al, 2015)

  • To provide a relatively comprehensive understanding of various tissue strain measurements and provide a convenient way in choosing a suitable experimental methodology, we reviewed the mechanical strain measurement techniques from six aspects: electro-based, light-based, ultrasound-based (US-based), magnetic resonance-based (MR-based) and computed tomography-based (CT-based) techniques, and the texture correlation-based (TC-based) image processing method

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Strain is an important mechanical factor that affects strain-associated biological function. Reviews on strain characterization include for example in vivo strain measurement of bone (Al Nazer et al, 2012; Yang, Bruggemann & Rittweger, 2011) and ligaments (Fleming & Beynnon, 2004) in humans and in-plane strain measurement with digital image correlation (DIC), current methods on strain characterization on bone (Grassi & Isaksson, 2015), and the feasibility of non-Doppler US methods with speckle tracking for fetal myocardial strain evaluation (Germanakis & Gardiner, 2012) These reviews are limited on strain evaluation of one or a few techniques or tissues. This review might aid in choosing adequate mechanical strain estimation tools for a study based on the listed pros and cons

SURVEY METHODOLOGY
SUMMARY OF THE MECHANICAL STRAIN MEASUREMENT
DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call