Abstract

Recently, the nonlinear flutter behavior of long-span suspension bridges has attracted attention. Unlike the classical theory of bridge flutter, the stable limit cycle oscillations (LCO) have occurred for some bluff aerodynamic configurations when the inflow velocity exceeded a specific critical value. To explore the influence of aerodynamic configurations on flutter behaviors a series of flutter tests for spring-suspended sectional models were conducted. When the leading edges and trailing edges with various shapes were installed at the sectional models, different flutter types occurred. In the test, the self-excited forces and flutter responses were measured. Then, the characteristics of coupling vibration and aerodynamic hysteresis of the two kinds of flutter were analyzed and compared. Finally, the role of the phase difference between self-excited forces and displacements was discussed in the mechanism difference of the classical flutter and the postflutter LCO. As the leading edge became the bluffer, the results showed that the type of flutter gradually transformed from classical divergent flutter to postcritical LCO and the torsional mode played a more important role in the flutter than in the vertical mode. For the postflutter LCO, there was a negative feedback pattern, i.e., as the vibration amplitude increased, the phase difference gradually decreased, and the energy input to the dynamic system did not grow rapidly, which limited the further vibration divergence and resulted in a stable LCO.

Highlights

  • In recent years, long-span suspension bridges have gradually developed towards more than2000 m, and the structure of the suspension bridge has become more slender and flexible [1]

  • As the leading edge became the bluffer, the results showed that the type of flutter gradually transformed from classical divergent flutter to postcritical limit cycle oscillations (LCO) and the torsional mode played a more important role in the flutter than in the vertical mode

  • The main purpose in the present study was to explore the potential mechanism of classical flutter and postflutter LCO, which was induced by the different aerodynamic configurations of leading and trailing edges

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Long-span suspension bridges have gradually developed towards more than. The linearized self-excited force model was further improved to be available for higher degrees of freedom, and lots of identification methods were developed to obtain the flutter derivatives, which have been successfully applied to evaluate the flutter critical wind speed [7,8]. Tang et al [25] experimentally investigated the nonlinear postflutter LCO of the shallow Π section under different angles of attack and damping conditions, which significantly influenced the critical flutter velocity and the steady-state amplitude of flutter. Wang et al [31] presented a 3D nonlinear flutter analysis of full-scale long-span bridges, the effects of partial correlation of the self-excited forces at different spanwise locations were considered and the predicted postflutter LCO responses were compared with 2D analysis results.

Experiment Setup
Test Device and Model Aerodynamic Configuration
Aerodynamic
Displacement and Aerodynamic Force Measurement
Structural Dynamic Parameters
Results
The response histories of of thethe classical flutter and postflutter
Hysteresis of Unsteady Aerodynamic Forces
Work Analysis of Unsteady Aerodynamic Force
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call