Experimental investigations of carcinogen-induced mutation spectra: Innovation, challenges and future directions

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed an expansion of mutagenesis research focusing on experimentally modeled genome-scale mutational signatures of carcinogens and of endogenous processes. Experimental mutational signatures can explain etiologic links to patterns found in human tumors that may be linked to same exposures, and can serve as biomarkers of exposure history and may even provide insights on causality. A number of innovative exposure models have been employed and reported, based on cells cultured in monolayers or in 3-D, on organoids, induced pluripotent stem cells, non-mammalian organisms, microorganisms and rodent bioassays. Here we discuss some of the latest developments and pros and cons of these experimental systems used in mutational signature analysis. Integrative designs that bring together multiple exposure systems (in vitro, in vivo and in silico pan-cancer data mining) started emerging as powerful tools to identify robust mutational signatures of the tested cancer risk agents. We further propose that devising a new generation of cell-based models is warranted to streamline systematic testing of carcinogen effects on the cell genomes, while seeking to increasingly supplant animal with non-animal systems to address relevant ethical issues and accentuate the 3R principles. We conclude that the knowledge accumulating from the growing body of signature modelling investigations has considerable power to advance cancer etiology studies and to support cancer prevention efforts through streamlined characterization of cancer-causing agents and the recognition of their specific effects.