Abstract
Special stainless steel 00Cr12Ni9Mo4Cu2 has multiple composition and inhomogeneous tissues; short circuiting will frequently occur when using conventional electrolyte processing. This article analyzes the reason why the process of machining is difficult from the material composition and structure. We used the NaNO3 and NaClO3 electrolyte composite to select the appropriate concentration, and then by using the orthogonal experiment and gray relational analysis method, we discussed how the voltage, feed speed, and electrolyte pressure solved the problem of the material removal rate (MRR), surface roughness (SR), and side gap. Under optimal conditions of 20 V, an electrolyte composite concentration of 178 g/l NaNO3 and 41 g/l NaClO3, a feed rate of 0.7 mm/min, and an electrolyte pressure of 0.8 MPa, a material removal rate of 100.8 mm3/min, a surface roughness of Ra 0.8 μm, and a side gap of 0.16 mm were produced. Given the same voltage, with an increasing cathode feed rate, the MRR was shown to increase while the surface roughness value and the side gap decreased. Under the same cathode feed rate, the MRR decreases, while the side gap and the surface roughness increase as the electrochemical machining application voltage increases. This study proves that using a certain concentration of electrolyte composite is a simple, low-cost, and feasible approach in improving efficiency and quality.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.