Abstract

Investigations on severe accident phenomena help us in understanding the realistic accidental phenomena for the assessment of associated risk. The societal impact of radiological leakage to the environment has demanded further robustness in the line of defence of nuclear safety. Thus, to ensure the cooling and stabilization of corium within reactor containment in case of severe accident scenarios, many new reactors have been envisaged with core catcher. In this regard, corium coolability still remains an unresolved issue in spite of several efforts being taken towards its understanding. After studying the various cooling strategies, it has been demonstrated that melt coolability using bottom flooding of water is one of the most efficient techniques so far. To study the effect of decay heat on melt pool coolability under bottom flooding condition, two experiments have been performed in this paper; one without the decay heat and the other with decay heat. The test section used for carrying out these experiments consisted of two parts viz. lower part for retaining the melt from furnace, water inlet and melt quenching, and upper part for steam expansion and its outlet. The total height of the test section was 1400mm and was made of 33mm thick carbon steel. Total six stainless steel nozzles of diameter 12mm were used for injecting water at the bottom of the melt pool. The lower part was surrounded by 10 radiative heaters to simulate decay heat of 10kW which corresponds to 0.5MW/m3. The experiments showed that quenching of about 25l of melt at initial temperature of nearly 1200°C took only a few minutes in both the cases. The debris formed in the experiments ranged between 0.5mm fine particles to 50mm porous chunks. The measured porosities were nearly 51% without decay heat and nearly 67% with decay heat. This paper presents the comparative experimental study of melt coolability using bottom flooding without and with decay heat scenarios. The experimental measurements show that the quenching behaviour of melt pool is not affected by decay heat, although stabilization of debris temperatures to saturation temperature takes a bit longer duration as compared to without decay heat scenarios.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.