Abstract
This study presents a direct experimental verification of the AISC-LRFD slenderness ratio formulas for built-up compression members. Comparisons of slenderness ratios as specified in various design codes including the AISC-ASD, the AISC-LRFD, the AS-4100 and the CSA S16-01, are also provided. Test results concluded from this study show that the 1999 LRFD formulas generally result in conservative design strengths. However, the 2005 LRFD yields slightly higher strength due to the use of a higher resistance factor of 0.9 instead of 0.85. The design strengths determined based on the slenderness ratio formulas of the Australian Code (AS-4100) are even more conservative. For back-to-back snug-tight bolted sections, the Canadian Code (CSA S16-01) gives virtually the same design outcome as the LRFD. While for back-to-back welded sections, the CSA S16-01 tends to yield a less conservative design.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
